Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I really find it funny tbh that Michael Gottlieb at Willkie can represent DRAKE in one of the most notorious rap battle feuds ever, where Drake was lightly accused of being a pedophile, and yet in that case the relationship between the attorneys is nowhere near as contentious as here in this case involving a kind of mid romance/DV movie. I’m not sure Lively should be moving to transfer this beef to SDNY, I’m not sure Liman would grant this. This whole litigation is just so wild. I have never seen anything like this before. If Freedman is actually dirty and Gottlieb can prove it, I will be elated. But I do think the chances of this being granted are low. [/quote] Dp how do you know the relationship between the attorneys for Drake and UMG is not contentious? Who are they? Are you working on one of their cases as well? [/quote] Hear me out. I know this will sound crazy to you, but I used The Google to search on the Drake case, which was last in the headlines back in April, and none of the lawyers had accused the other of extortion or was directly subpoenaing communications of the law firms, afaict.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics