Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yeah I’m sure that the reason some Baldoni supporters are shutting their feeds off for a while is all because of Nick Shapiro and has nothing to do with the fact (as they have been saying on Reddit) that they don’t like to hear about all of the losing Freedman is doing. 💯 [/quote] Honestly just worried about the mental health of the Lively supporter who spams this post 24/7, often with strange conspiracy theories. But hey, if you all think that is normal and should be encouraged, continue to have no real life, Lively spammer.[/quote] I mean on the last page alone, the same person posted about Shapiro 4x; twice using the exact same sentence. I don't know why you are under the impression that only Blake posters are "flooding the zone." It's hard to know what else posting the exact same post repeatedly could be characterized as?[/quote] I’m not that poster but pretty sure her point, which remains unrebutted, is that Lively supporters want to ignore Shapiro’s presence on her team and the implications of his role. In any case, she/he posted about this for maybe half an hour. If it goes on for six months, day and night, let me know.[/quote] That was me and I posted it to make a point. Often the Lively person/people claim they are just random parties, here to post (when they’re not at their law firm jobs) about these cases, read motions, research legal parties, etc etc. All in the guise of fairness and truth, so I’m just curious why not one of them (and they claimed to be multiple people) was interested in opining on that issue. Seems funny given their commitment to this case, including commenting on every peep the other sides lawyer makes. My question was ignored again and again, even though these poster(s) had time to scroll back for 30 pages and apparently have continued reading and posting since I left hours ago. That’s some law firm job that allows so much non billable time! Wow! So I’ll ask again… Why do you think Lively hired a former CIA psy ops guy to do PR for her? What’s your thought on that?[/quote] I think you are talking to your own fellow Baldoni supporter? I'm the annoying Lively supporter you hate and I responded to this already above. Hope that helps.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics