Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there.  Was the change bought?  Was the mod who left the one who was being paid?  I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings.  With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site?  I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

[b]I hope more info on the smear gets exposed a[/b]nd I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too. [/quote]

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin? [/quote]

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported.  While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry. [/quote]

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real. [/quote]

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time.  Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs.[b] I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. [/b] Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut?  No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have.  I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone.  Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team. [/quote]

Because this is INSANE. No one lightly chiming in on a message board about a celebrity wants to meet up in person with anyone batshit crazy enough to propose that as a possibility. [/quote]

DP. Thank you! I was baffled by how this poster could twist this bizarre offer into something normal

She still won’t say what kind of law she practices, but yet she claims she’ll meet in person. Got it. [/quote]

I proposed the meetup thinking that you would be less inclined to throw insults over the internet at someone you have met in person than someone you see as faceless. This is actually the way it has worked with other message boards where I have attended meetups, though granted with those boards people had a loginID you’d recognize them from. Now that this thread has gone on for 800+ pages, though, I think I could distinguish a few different people.  I’ve talked to some of you more than I’ve talked to many associates at my firm.  The other reason is that I’m really from the DMV like I say I am, so meeting in DC is pretty easy and NBD.

I don’t really want to meet up anymore since I kind of feel like some of you might hurt me lol, but those were my original thoughts.

And PP is spot on re the “what area of the law” question just being code for “let me find other ways to insult and demean you.”  I don’t specialize in defamation or harassment law, but I can still read a very poorly written complaint involving defamation and extortion, and oppositions to MTDs re same, and tell you they are flawed and badly written. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics