Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have a basic question I haven't seen answered, but I may have. missed it in all these pages. Did JB REJECT her request for an intimacy coordinator? Did she ask for one from the beginning? if not, why not? She had a lot of power on this movie.[/quote] There was always an IC attached to the movie. Lively does not allege that there wasn't. It is standard for a movie to engage an IC to choreograph and ensure professionalism for intimate scenes. What Lively does allege is that the IC was not always present on the set for intimate scenes, and that Baldoni sometimes changed scenes last minute to make them more intimate without warning Lively or engaging the IC. She's saying that there was no way for her to ensure there was an IC on set for a scene with intimate content if she didn't know there would be intimate content until the day of the shoot or in the middle of the scene. Yes, Lively had power on the set, but if Lively had shut down production in order to get an IC on set for those scenes, it would have cost the production thousands of dollars and delayed production. Even an actor who has a lot of power in general might feel very pressured to move forward with a scene where they aren't comfortable rather than shut down production until the IC can be brought it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics