Reply to That Brock Allen Turner is a dirtbag

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "That Brock Allen Turner is a dirtbag"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The NYDN piece comparing a similar case makes this sentencing even more disgusting, if that is possible:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-brock-turner-cory-batey-show-race-affects-sentencing-article-1.2664945[/quote]

Except Brock Turner did not carry an unconscious woman anywhere.  And he didn't rape the woman or videotape the act.  Nor was he convicted of rape.

The devil is in these little details.

[/quote]

Call it "sexual assault" then. He was convicted of two counts of penetrating Emily's body with a foreign object.

How does that make it better?

[/quote]

Why do you want to equate the crimes? That seems to minimize what happened to the woman in the Vanderbilt case.[/quote]

Stop with the concern trolling.

The effects of date rape and stranger rape are the same for the victim.  [/quote]

He didn't RAPE her!!! There is that.  [/quote]

He penetrated her unconscious body. That is rape.  You are hanging your hat on the technical name of  crime in California. If you stick your fingers in someone's body without their permission, you are engaged in rape.

If rape required using a penis by the defendant, then no woman could ever rape a man, and we know that women can rape men. [/quote]

California law is more nuanced than that. Rape requires intent, and proving that he wanted to rape her and not just have sex with her wasn't possible. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics