Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For those that think she’s guilty, how do you explain his injuries and where his body was found? The commonwealth hasn’t figured it out yet and it’s a virtually insurmountable problem in their case.[/quote] The defense proved it for the prosecution with their reconstruction video they stupidly insisted in having admitted. They had to admit it themselves because it was discoverable. Karen's words from the Netflix show will convict her. Not sure they had the impact for people not in the courtroom that they had when played for the jury at key times during the trial. Her words + the crash test dummy reconstruction + the timeline from the car and his phone = guilty. If the jury comes back hung or NG, they were likely already biases from he conspiracy theory in the prior trial and media. [/quote] The reconstructionist’s video showed that a vehicle that strikes an arm can break a taillight, but the inextricable flip side to that (as also testified to) is it would completely mess up your arm (fractures, severe bruising). Instead his arm is covered in scrapes consistent with a dog attack. The commonwealth’s case would be great if the conditions of the body supported their theory. Maybe it’s a crazy fluke or something, but the jury can’t just ignore the actual injuries in the victim.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics