Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Queen Elizabeth II"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can someone explain the rationale/justification for exempting the inheritance of the sovereign’s estate from the 40% inheritance tax that applies to everyone else? Does the sovereign need so much independent wealth to avoid being beholden to any legislator and he truly independent? It doesn’t make sense from a legal or policy perspective.[/quote] I’m anti-monarchy and pro-estate tax but this actually makes some sense to me. In ordinary cases, it’s common for the one inheriting to sell off some of the property to pay a large estate tax. They can’t do this, as they are prohibiting from selling the property. They don’t have the whole bundle or property rights. But I also think it’s a bit rich when people say “oh but it’s their private property.” I mean, I guess so. But only because they inherited it through an insanely rigid system of primogeniture that initially sprung from a might makes right acquisition of the land from others. I guess most property rights are similar — in that the original property owner always either stole the land or just accouncee it as their own. But this is the most extreme example.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics