Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]So, because you don't like a website that cites sources, it's not legitimate? Did you not go to HS? Serious question. [/quote] Yes, I actually did! In fact, I have gone quite a big beyond a Master's Degree and am a voracious reader. But, the person who really taught me to think critically and pay attention to resources was my high school American History teacher who was also my Econ teacher. She related current events to history, She required a "term paper" which demanded extensive research from[b] primary sources.[/b] This was pre-internet and I spent hours in the public library doing research. Another thing she did was bring in newspaper articles and had us underline adjectives so that we could learn how the reporter or opinion writer was influencing us. Another reading requirement was [i]The Hidden Persuaders.[/i] For those who don't know, it is a book about the advertising industry and its influence. It also applies to politics. This background served me well in college and beyond. It still serves me well. Sounds like you think that if others report things you don't like that they are not legitimate. Sad. [/quote] DP So, just to point out...... The RedState article takes quotes and excerpts from testimony and transcripts and lays out an argument that Susan Rice may well NOT have been present at a meeting she claims to have attended. IOW - it uses PRIMARY SOURCES to make the argument. Had you even looked at the piece, you would have known that. You don't have to agree with the author's questions and conclusions, but you also don't get to call it "not legitimate" because you don't like it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics