Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "If Jesus wasn’t a real historical figure, where did Christian theology come from? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Atheists spending their day, day after day, as fringe deniers. Every historian and scholar in the western world accepts Jesus historically. Anyone who doesn’t is a fringe denier and conspiracy theorist. [/quote] No one denied. :roll: [/quote] You opened up the probability of denial by saying there was a 1-49% chance Jesus didn’t exist. Enough of the dumb semantic games. [/quote] No one said there was a 49% chance. I can see what the PP got frustrated with the blatant lying. Isn’t that a sin or something? Thou shall not troll? “Most likely” exists is not denying. That *is* the most likely scenario. [b]We just don’t have definitive evidence that he lived[/b]. We only have people who heard about him from other people and then some people wrote it down based on what they heard. [/quote] And here’s where you’re out of step with thousands of scholars, including the three above, who are convinced he definitely lived.[/quote] They think the circumstantial evidence is compelling. That doesn’t make it definitive. [/quote] Why are you speaking for thousands of scholars and academics?[/quote] Because there is only circumstantial evidence available. And many say “I accept” the historicity. [/quote] You have zero right to speak for any historian, scholar, or academic. What are your qualifications to speak for these people? [/quote] They say “I accept” the historicity because it is very likely he lived. Nobody can say definitively because we don’t have a direct evidence. [/quote] You and your word games. Now you’re arguing that “I accept” somehow implies a continued sliver of doubt. This is laughable. Also, cites please. Who exactly is saying “I accept”?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics