Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Pete Hedgseth for Secretary of Defense"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pete's former sister-in-law has signed an affidavit swearing that his second wife, Samantha, was scared of him, hid in a closet from him and had a safe word so the sister-in-law could help her escape him. [quote]According to the affidavit, during the marriage, Samantha Hegseth developed and executed plans with members of Hegseth’s family and mutual friends to help her escape “if she felt she needed to get away from Hegseth.” Stop it. She said it was not true and also said she was not authorizing anyone to speak for her. One individual with indirect knowledge of Samantha Hegseth’s alleged escape plans had previously told committee staffers about them, according to three sources familiar with the conversations. NBC News has also spoken with two other sources who had been aware of these plans before the committee staffers heard about them. These plans included what Danielle Hegseth refers to in the affidavit as a “safe word/code word” that Samantha could text her to let friends and family know that Pete Hegseth was in a potentially dangerous and volatile state at home and that Samantha needed help. In the affidavit, Danielle Hegseth also says that one time “sometime in 2015-2016,” Samantha did text her one of these words and activated the escape plan. Danielle Hegseth also alleges in the affidavit that Samantha told her that on one occasion Samantha had “hid in her closet from Hegseth because she feared for her personal safety.” [/quote] Samantha Hegseth's response: [quote]In an email response Monday, Samantha Hegseth said: “First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.” She added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer.” Asked what information was not accurate and for comment on the affidavit, she replied on Tuesday: “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.” [/quote] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/senators-received-affidavit-containing-new-allegations-pete-hegseth-de-rcna188342[/quote] 3 kids. I wouldn't go on record to make a statement either. As a divorced mom I would want my kids to maintain a relationship with their father, even if he was a douchebag.[/quote][/quote] To be clear Danielle Dietrich was formerly married to Pete Hegseth’s brother and had a bitter divorce. She is an avowed Trump hater and has admitted she never personally witnessed any abuse. Sad that this is somehow omitted from most media. Now hopefully some clarification on why Samantha Hegseth is coming forward to reaffirm this is not true and she has not authorized anyone to speak for her. Shame what this woman (Danielle Dietrich ) will do for politics ). Someone needs to remind the senators who are talking about this and omitting the relevant facts. [/quote] MAGA is here to defend the indefensible...typical[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics