Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Soooo, how is high-density looking to everyone now?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Increasing density is the new redlining. So racist.[/quote] +1000 When they talk about replacing single family homes with condos, they’re almost always talking about single family homes owned by black people. And it’s almost always white people who are buying the condos. This is why the share of white residents in DC is skyrocketing. DC has the worst displacement of minority and low-income people in the country thanks to “increasing density.” [/quote] This again? White people are buying up single family homes that used to be owned by AA families because DC is a desirable place to live and there is not enough supply. In most neighborhoods this happens well before any densification happens and in some neighborhoods it happens without any densification at all. Now it is true that one of the reasons densification attracts more affluent whites is because those neighborhoods tend to be more attractive - they have better transit, are more walkable/bikeable and usually have better retail and are more vibrant. I lived in Columbia Heights 30 years ago - you will not find anyone,[b] black or white, who prefers CH circa 1990[/b] to what it has evolved to in the last 20 years (though it hasn't actually changed that dramatically). It is unfortunate the city has not allowed enough housing to be built to keep prices down so more people can live in highly desirable locations. [/quote] I don't prefer the crime that was prevalent then; I 100% prefer the physical layout. The gentrification/density plan that came in with metro was rushed and ill-thought through. CH looks horrible, especially the big box area around the metro.[/quote] Yeah, the trash-strewn massive vacant lot that sat where DCUSA now is was sooooo much better.[/quote] Now CH is trash strewn big box. It could have all been developed better. They rushed it. It practically went up overnight. Shame.[/quote] DCUSA is really the only bad project in CH - it is ugly, has too much parking and generates endless illegal parking despite having an excess of parking spaces. If DC didn't owe so much money for the stupid parking garage it would probably make sense to tear it down and re-build that project. Most of the other projects were actually nicely done and there was in fact a lot of planning that went into CH. The Tivoli Theater I think came out particularly well and there are also some nice new pocket parks. In any case it is way better than it was post riot and pre 1996 when that block was one of the sketchiest in NW DC. Despite the complaints about gentrification both the population and retail mix in CH are actually pretty diverse and there is still a lot of affordable housing in that neighborhood though much of it of course is subsidized.[/quote] It is nice to see the Tivoli Theater facade saved--I agree. They do a good job with that overall in DC. That is thoughtful planning. The area around the metro entrance leaves me cold. Doesn't seem green, pretty or clean. Kind of a sterile big box feel. Given the AA history of DC, the nearby use of Mt. pleasnt as a place for wealthy residents to "summer", and then Latino influx into CH, they could have gone for some heritage design too, with some 1930s quaintness meets modern function. Perhaps made that square like one with a fountain you'd find in a Latin American borough. The problem isn't some development--it's rushing. And in the case of the Mayor's plan, ramming through. When you take quality of life, aesthetics, surveys, and why we have existing green protections like setbacks into consideration, you can come up with a better plan than simply a real estate no holds barred gold rush. I'm sorry, but I watched CH go up overnight and I don't think it was done particularly well at all. I am never tempted to go "hang out" in the square by metro.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics