Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]We shouldn't have a pool because DC can't maintain anything -We should fix other things first -We never heard anyone clamoring for an outdoor pool in Ward 3 -Ward 3 has never had a pool so what is the rush - let's take our time and get this right -The City should first rule out/exhaustively study all other possible locations for a pool in Ward 3 before considering this site -We know where the better locations are for a pool -The pool should be as close to Hearst ES as possible -The pool should be as far from Hearst ES as possible -It's unfair to take away any of the tennis courts -There are other more pressing needs for outdoor recreational uses that should be addressed first -I've lived near this park since 1948 and it is a great urban park and nothing about it should ever change Yes. I agree. Lots of reasons to oppose a pool. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
