Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So anyone sexual assault victim that has lied before deserves it? Is that the road you want to go down?[/quote] Very bad logic. You draw the wrong conclusions. No, it means that anyone, including a sexual assault victim with a history of lying, deceit and dishonesty is not themselves a credible source. So anything that such a victim says needs to be corroborated and confirmed by outside information: 3rd parties who can confirm, external data like reports filed, etc. In the case of Reade, dozens of people have been interviewed, including many that she herself identified as being able to confirm or corroborate her claims. The vast majority have no knowledge of her claims, have no recollection of anything similar to whats she contends and believe that what she claims did not happen. She has 2 people who she told that will confirm that she told them that it happened. She keeps changing her story of documentation. She claimed that she filed a report about sexual assault, then when questioned, said that it was only a report about sexual harassment. When no such documentation could not be found, she changed it to a report about being made to feel uncomfortable and even that could not be found. She claims that a completely vague recording of a woman from 1993 confirms that she told her mother about being assaulted, but her mother has passed and the comment from the unidentified woman is so completely vague it could be made to construe about anything she wants it to be. She got fired and it could be that she told her mother that she was angry about being fired and it would fit the quote. She has a history that shows she has no compunction against lying as it conveniently suits her and she had no problems playing with details and facts and spinning stories to be completely different. So, why would she have any credibility as a victim. You need a lot more than that to destroy an accuser's career and reputation.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics