Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states! Different strokes for different folks. You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South. We all win.[/quote] Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period. [/quote] Poor women in the south are voting with rich women in the south to choose life! Take a seat white savior.[/quote] Is it all "states rights," all the way? Do we go back on Loving v. Virginia, too -- the case law based on the same right to privacy as Roe v. Wade and all the other things earmarked by Clarence Thomas -- and invalidate marriages between people of different races? What if a state starts raising the spectre of 3/5 again? If you think there are federal protections across "states rights," how do you code that to exclude some things but not others? Or is it all okay, if the state decides it?[/quote] Lol. Oh yes, protecting the unborn is just a small step from Jim Crow and worse. Well we actually have Jim Crow 2.0 already (which is how all those folks voted in GA recently), but yes interracial marriage is in the cross hairs and slavery is the long game. Just we need to drum up the market price for cotton first because I don’t know what they will do, and it seems like all the hard labor is being done by Mexicans in the south just like up north. You read our play book ![/quote] No one read your play book. You’ve been announcing your plays on the PA system. “We hate women! We tolerate them so long as they’re dumb and docile and do our bidding. Everyone else is a feminazi who deserves whatever we do to her.” “The confederacy will rise again. Lynching is an awesome tool for keeping Black people afraid, and it works best if the cops do it, so they can never feel safe. But for maximum second classery, rights are only granted to White people (soon only White men, just gotta infiltrate a few more institutions). Systemic racism is our friend!” Etc. You always think you’re such open minded, intelligent people but you hurr durr durr your way through life.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics