Reply to Did you believe Amanda Knox was guilty?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Did you believe Amanda Knox was guilty?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have read the trial transcripts. She was definitely present and heavily involved. Whether she actually cut the victim's throat is unknown. She got off on a technicality, but only after serving time for false accusing her boss (a black man).[/quote]

So you bought the procecution's story despite the actual evidence. The prosecutor is a charlatan who exploits the fact that there are gullible people like you in the world to push his political aspirations. [/quote]

She didn't get off on a technicality.  The appellate court (which conducts a full review of the case) found that there was no evidence of her guilt.  Then the Supreme Court found that the case was without foundation, and strongly criticizing the conduct of the investigators and prosecutors.  That's not a technicality--it's the opposite of one.  [/quote]

They reheard the case after it was found the police mishandled evidence (a bra clasp with DNA evidence). She was found guilty before the massive PR effort and pressure from US. I recommend "Murder in Perugia" for a concise summation of the facts.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics