Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Millennials aren't going to buy your ugly mcmansions, silly Boomers!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Gen Xer here with two middle school kids in McLean VA. My wife and I knocked down our tiny 1960s split level (worth $~750K) and built a new home (now worth ~$1.6 million). The neighborhood we live in has a mix of tear downs and older homes. It's a large home, but we still have a nice backyard and added many upgrades that weren't cheap although I think the haters would still call it a McMansion. However, I don't understand the desire for the alternative. Here's what I mean: Our old home had a brick exterior, no house wrap, tiny windows, squeaky floors, no drain tile so the basement leaked, no basement vapor barrier so radon was leaking up, and no character. The original kitchen contained asbestos tiles (which was covered up). The energy efficiency of the house was terrible. Why is what I described better than a new home? Sure, we decided to use HardiPlank vs. brick on the outside but that’s a personal design preference but everything else in the new place is superior to the old one. I hear comments from people that our old home used plywood and solid wood beams but the new home uses Advantech OSB and beams. Well, science tells us that the products are structurally equivalent and OSB is stronger in shear values. The new home has a radon system, better drainage, large windows so we don’t need to use as much electricity, sensors that shut off lights to save energy, and is air tight. The floor doesn’t squeak and is less likely to in the long run, our fire alarm is integrated into home security system which makes it a much safer home (e.g., the air conditioner shuts off if a fire is detected). And yes, we now use our gourmet kitchen to cook most of our meals because it’s just much easier and fun (our old kitchen was tiny and it sucked to cook in)! Why is our ‘McMansion’ worse than our old home? [/quote] I'm the 37yo PP who lives in DC in a SFH. Sounds like a sound decision to me to knock down the old house. We wouldn't live that far out because our jobs are in DC, but if you don't have/don't mind a long commute, it sounds like the new build definitely allows better quality of life than the older house. We have an older house (1930s), but thus far we haven't encountered too many problems in terms of maintenance, have had pretty great appreciation over the past few years, and bottom line, we just felt it was worth it to live in the city, with a short commute. YMMV. [/quote] Thanks for recognizing that every situation is different and many of us "McMansion' owners have good reasons to tear down the old...By the way, I work in DC as well and my morning commute is 20 minutes in (@7am) and 20 - 35 minutes coming home depending on traffic (leaving ~4:30). I don't think that's such a long commute. When I lived in NYC, my commute from the upper east side down to mid-town was about the same (but I was able to get some exercise by walking part of the way so it's not exactly equivalent) [/quote] 37yo PP here again. A few random observations (slow work day, as our office is closing early for the holiday weekend). I have millennial friends/coworkers who live in the suburbs (Bethesda, Rockville), and I also have friends who live in DC. Re: my own neighborhood, where entry SFHs are going for $800K and up (and those that need significant work are going for $700K), almost every new listing is being snapped up by early-late 30-somethings moving from areas like Petworth with 1-2 infants/toddlers. We ourselves were not firmly in either the suburb or city camp. We lived in the suburbs for a little while when we first moved to the area. One of us likes suburbs, the other likes city living. We looked in a range of close-in suburbs (Bethesda, Chevy Chase, Silver Spring, Takoma Park), but we happened to like the house and the DC neighborhood where we ended up buying, which is sort of smack in the middle of all of these. It also seemed to have the best value in terms of appreciation. We live close to Rock Creek Park, and our low-density neighborhood of SFHs is arguable pretty suburban despite being in DC. What I find to be different re: our suburban friends: 1) They are more risk-averse re: schools. They understandably didn't want to play around with the school situation. They wanted a sure thing, and the DC school situation just seemed too daunting/too time-consuming to figure out, especially for those who already have demanding/time-consuming jobs. (Ironically, some of them have their kids in private anyway.) 2) They are more risk averse re: safety. Staying in the city, with all the dangers of violent crime, etc., is just something they didn't want to deal with. 3) They just prefer suburbs, with more green space, etc. Re: our city friends: 1) Some of them just REALLY wanted to live in the city, whether natives or transplants, and were willing to take more risks re: schools to make it work. Check the DC public school boards for a sampling of the angst, indecision, and hand-wringing re: the school situation, especially with the PARCC test results now released (and I say this with no judgment as someone with a child in our local DCPS). OTOH, some of the folks I know who live in DC and have kids in public schools are relatively laid-back about the school situation, and feel their kids will do fine. 2) Some really don't want long commutes, which just seem to be getting longer over the years as traffic in the area increases. Even if it means buying a smaller SFH, rowhome, or a condo, they were willing to sacrifice for the short commutes. 3) Some had decent enough HHIs to either buy in the best DC school districts and/or can afford privates. 4) Some wanted more diversity, or a certain type of diversity. Many of our neighbors would cite ethnic/racial diversity and/or proximity to places of worship as reasons for moving here (large AA and Jewish populations). Tl; dr: Different strokes for different folks. P.S. Twenty minutes is an awesome commute, PP. My commute is actually much longer (but I incorporate walking into my commute for exercise). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics