Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Who did you think killed JonBenet?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Accidental cover up is the least likely theory to me. If one of your children hit your other on the head or caused them to hit their head, and they were injured, you wouldn't even stop to find out why or how it happened, you would call 911 or drive to straight to the emergency room while getting the story. These were parents who had never denied their children medical care or anything like that. No one's reaction to being surprised by an injury would be to a) assume it would cause their other YOUNG child to be charged with anything or need protection and then b) KILL their injured child by strangling them with a garrote and then sexually assault the child. I think there is a possibility (I give about 50%) a Ramsey did it, but if they did, they did something on purpose intending to commit a crime. I doubt this was the crime of a 9 or 10 year old child, it almost certainly would have been an adult. [b]Additionally, if they parents had abused her either before or that night openly (while Burke was awake) then it seems pretty likely a child of that age would have disclosed that eventually. [/b] I think there an equal possibility it was an intruder because none of the Ramseys seem to have any indication of the psychopathy required to do this to a small child. You have to take that into account. It's a very brutal crime with a sexual element (whether "staged" or not). That's statistically one of the rarest kinds of homicide (vs for example shooting someone in a drug deal). It just seems so improbable that someone would commit this crime because their child got injured...or wet the bed...or anything. It would have to be a [b]depraved heart psychopath[/b] who meant to do it and quite frankly the Ramseys just don't fit. But then again no other serial criminal has emerged so that's weird too. [/quote] You know jack sh*t about abuse then. People stay silent for years, sometimes forever. This is an interview with Frank Shorter, an Olympic runner. He and his siblings were beaten regularly by his well-respected Dr. father. He disclosed how this abuse led him to running as an adult (age 63) in a magazine interview. With the revelations, the lead interview insisted on having corroboration from his siblings. There stories of rapes and abuse that the siblings had never talked about even among themselves: http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2016/08/02/frank-shorter-olympics-marathon Covering up the murder, wouldn't necessarily show the heart of a psychopath, but rather the same kind of personality that value how things look above all else. A person would bleach her kid's hair and parade her though a myriad of beauty pageants. A person who lost one child, but wasn't going to lose another, so writes a ridiculous 2-3 page ransom not from a note pad in her home. A person who would hire a publicist for the funeral of her slain daughter. Murdering out of passion or lying about a murder doesn't make you a serial killer.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics