Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "NY Post publishes nude photos of Melania"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?[/quote] They are a bunch of hypocrites. Snorting Cocaine is fine as long as it's done by Obama, dropping pants in front of a young intern in the White House is nothing, that' their wild billy. Feminism stops at Trump's beautiful wife. NY Post published it but it's mostly liberals who are rejoice of this and used it as an attack on Melania's "fitness" to be the First Lady.[/quote] It's funny how you forgot to mention George Bush's past with cocaine.[/quote] Yeah, W. had an actual substance abuse problem. Obama experimented with drugs. And Bill Clinton is a letch--no question. However, these photos are "artistic;" they're not celebrating the power of women. They were meant for ogling in a men's magazine. There is a lot of hypocrisy in how Michelle Obama is vilified for showing her arms too much and people saying that these pictures are okay b/c she was a model, it was a long time ago etc. Yes, everyone has a past, but posing for nudie pix doesn't give off appropriate gravitas for someone who would be first lady. Most of the world thinks this way--and yeah it ain't fair but this is the perception.[/quote] I think you need to distinguish behaviors while serving as FLOTUS versus modeling pictures from over 20 years ago before you even met spouse who is running for office. That being said I am the first pp of this quoted thread s/o and don't have an issue with showing arms as long as it is appropriate for occasion while serving as FLOTUS...I.e. cultural sensitivities when engaged in meetings with other dignitaries etc who feel strongly on matter...I.e. similar to covering shoulders when entering some churches etc. [/quote] Umm, seriously. Having old porn pics from your younger days published is embarrassing for anyone. Porn pics are not respectable for anyone, whether or not they have aspirations to the White House.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics