Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "NY Post publishes nude photos of Melania"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?[/quote] They are a bunch of hypocrites. Snorting Cocaine is fine as long as it's done by Obama, dropping pants in front of a young intern in the White House is nothing, that' their wild billy. Feminism stops at Trump's beautiful wife. NY Post published it but it's mostly liberals who are rejoice of this and used it as an attack on Melania's "fitness" to be the First Lady.[/quote] It's funny how you forgot to mention George Bush's past with cocaine.[/quote] Yeah, W. had an actual substance abuse problem. Obama experimented with drugs. And Bill Clinton is a letch--no question. However, these photos are "artistic;" they're not celebrating the power of women. They were meant for ogling in a men's magazine. There is a lot of hypocrisy in how Michelle Obama is vilified for showing her arms too much and people saying that these pictures are okay b/c she was a model, it was a long time ago etc. Yes, everyone has a past, but posing for nudie pix doesn't give off appropriate gravitas for someone who would be first lady. Most of the world thinks this way--and yeah it ain't fair but this is the perception.[/quote] Do you mean are or aren't artistic? Because if baring your breasts and touching your vulva for the camera is art, there are a lot of Picassos out there...you know which websites.[/quote] Picasso's art wasn't meant to titillate and these photos were; that was their purpose. The photos are equivalent to Maxim's hot list, and I don't consider those "art" Artfully posed and photoshopped maybe. And I didn't call them porn, but yeah they look like soft core porn. Honestly, it's too bad that Trump wasn't still married to Marla. Ivana is scary, Melania is intelligent as a fence post. At least Marla came off more or less like she had a brain.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics