Reply to Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The people who live around there should be celebrating a Sunrise development, lest the space otherwise be turned into something like that tacky LAmbiance of McLean subdivision across the street. At least Sunrise won't bring more kids into the overcrowded schools.[/quote]

The McLean schools aren't particularly overcrowded, particularly compared with APS these days.  At most 15 homes could be built on the site given the current zoning, and it's safe to assume only a fraction of the families would have kids or send them to public school.  It's a residential area and both L'Ambiance and other developments in the area have more than held their value. I can more than understand the opposition to skirting the zoning laws and allowing Sunrise to change the character of the neighborhood. If John Foust is so eager to do favors for Sunrise, let him redistrict Balls Hill Road near his house to accommodate them. [/quote]

McLean would be more over crowded if their class sizes were as small as Arlington's.  Arlington can solve quite a bit of its problem by raising the class size by 5 students.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics