Reply to Why isn't MCPS redistricting Rachel Carlson

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Why isn't MCPS redistricting Rachel Carlson"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And sorry but yes, they should be building a school NOW for the Crown development.  There are homes that are moved in, sold and for sale, more being built and it isn't like single couples deciding to have kids in 5yrs are the only ones moving in. Kids are already living there.  By next year school year, 70% of the homes projected to be built will be lived in or sold.  It takes 5yrs minimum to plan and build a school.  They haven't even started planning.  So what is going to happen to those surrounding schools?  Over capacity, portables, awful lunch times, no room for recess.  Then another round of studying for redistricting etc...  It is never ending and never done right.  [/quote]
Very few purchasers at Crown plan to send their kids to MCPS.  It's a very expensive development zoned for GBurg.  One of the builders (I won't name them) came out and told me about how I can send my kid to private from there - they aren't stupid.  [b]People buying homes in the 800k to 1.2M price range aren't sending them to the GBurg cluster.[/b][/quote]

No, but people buying residences in the $500,000-$600,000 price range might, and that's the majority of the units.[/quote]
The only residences in that price range are the stacked condos and, perhaps, the very narrow Pulte townhomes (with no upgrades).  Practically speaking, the foregoing units are not for people with kids - in fact, the Pulte rep told me their target demographic are 20 something first time buyers who want a starter home before they have kids.  If someone has kids and can only afford this price range, they are not going to buy at Crown - they can just get more space for the same price (and a better school district) in Fallsgrove.[/quote]

I can't speak to whether Crown really will be filled with empty nesters and other childless people (although if you google Crown, realtors tout the school district as a benefit), but somewhere else on DCUM someone noted that the developments at Park Potomac (similar price range) was also pitched as a place for rich childless people and in fact it ended up that families (sometimes more than one per unit) were flocking to Park Potomac and threw off the projections.  I'd love to see any studies that support that assertion, especially since Park Potomac looks to be expanding dramatically (I think this is JW and RM, no?)

This is also relevant to the proposed Westbard redevelopment.  Developer plans there also claim that the target will be empty nesters and single people, but I can guarantee that, in an area where the median house price is $1M or more, plenty of families will opt to buy/rent in Westbard if they build high density residences there.  For MCPS to blindly accept these developer claims (which coincidentally support the idea that no new investment in schools would be required as a result of their developments) is foolish.  In the case of Westbard, the receiving ES, Wood Acres, is already 145% overcapacity and will remain overcapacity after the addition, so something other than, "we'll figure it out later," is required.[/quote]

You do all realize that when the developers CLAIM it will be all singles and empty nesters, the projections look lower, hence green light to build and no need for a school.  Win Win for developer. Then they are long gone when the realization comes that they were wrong.  The assumption that families or single parent families do not live in condos, apartments, townhouses is ridiculous.  Whoever in the county follows this - is truly messing it up.  My guess is it is political and the developer's money goes towards campaigns and not the schools.

And if you all think 26Mil is too much for the Crown Developer, you are insane.  That is chump change.  Honestly.   And it wouldn't cost 26M to them.  They would do it at cost which would be 10Mil.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics