Reply to Sorry you're poor

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Sorry you're poor "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

[b]We've been throwing money at poverty for, what, 60 years. There is still poverty[/b].

How about we house our homeless veterans in military bases, rather than illegals?

Now do you see why there is still poverty?  Because it's about the voting block. [/quote]

We've been throwing money at the military for 60 years. There are still wars.
We've been throwing money at education for 60 years. There are still people who need education. (Children, for example.)
We've been throwing money at road-building for 60 years. There are still transportation problems.
We've been throwing money at policing and incarceration for 60 years. There is still crime.
We've been throwing money at health care for 60 years. There are still illnesses.[/quote]

This is perhaps one of the lamest responses I have seen on DCUM.
Military - we will always NEED military - unless of course, you do not care about the safety of our country.
Education - we will always NEED education - but, I agree, the federal government should get out of this area.  
Road Building - we will always NEED roads - and as technology improves, so do our roads.
Policing and Incarceration - we will always NEED police and places to house criminals.  As much as you would like this world to be perfect, there will always be criminals.
Health care - we will always NEED health care.  And, as people learn more, our medical system advances and health care improves.

But, poverty?  We don’t NEED poverty.  The efforts our government has made at combatting poverty simply has not worked.  Yet, more money is being poured into it year after year, making more and more people dependent on government instead of becoming self-sufficient.

Sorry, your comparison has failed miserably.  [/quote]

We don't need poverty. We do need housing, food, and health care, though. Which is what the government spending on poverty goes for. [/quote]

And, has the poverty as a result of this spending decreased?  No.  That is the point.  What the government is doing to address poverty has done nothing to improve it.  [/quote]

Have wars decreased as a result of this spending? Has the number of people in jail decreased? Has the need for roads decreased? No. Then what are we spending all that money on?[/quote]

Once again, your comparisons are lame.  
If we had it your way, we would have no military, no police or prisons, and no roads.  What a wonderful world that would be.  [/quote]

NP.  I do not see a poster suggesting we do not need the military, police, or roads.

Someone with reading comprehension would realize that the poster rightly pointed out that a program is not useless, merely because it has not made itself obsolete.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics