Reply to Ludlow-Taylor getting a new a new Principal

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Ludlow-Taylor getting a new a new Principal"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]+1.  As the many parents in the neighborhood who've rejected L-T know, along with countless prospective home owners who bought elsewhere on the Hill over concerns about the school, much of the OOB population is comprised of families who used to live in the Stanton Park neighborhood.  This isn't the normal OOB population one finds in Hill elementary schools (e.g. a family residing in the Payne or Miner Districts who lotteries into Peabody or Maury).

The dominant OOB crowd moved elsewhere in the city when gentrification pushed property values and rents up, or to PG County, but continued to use L-T, often by borrowing the addresses of elderly in-boundary relatives to enroll. DCPS hasn't cracked down because in-boundary demand has been weak. But with demand picking up fast, and leadership that is likely to be far more neighborhood friendly than it's been for a decade, the OOB group's glory days are numbered.

Rapid change will engender a great deal of conflict at L-T, but at the end of the day, maybe five years from now, true in-boundary parents will call the shots there.  They can't run off to SWS, Cap Hill Montessori or charters like they could just a few years ago.  I don't doubt that in-boundary parents will ultimately reinvent L-T as high SES friendly to the upper grades.  Good luck to them.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics