Reply to Proposal Implications: Loss of Proximity, Forced to go to Lowest Performing School, Concerns OOB

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Proposal Implications: Loss of Proximity, Forced to go to Lowest Performing School, Concerns OOB"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was simply point in out that on this thread people have started using proximity preference = closest school. That isn't the case nor has it ever been the case.

While I didn't post about the block swap it is pretty easy to see that while the block # may be the same the are swapping a few sparsely populated blocks for blocks with much higher density of living with an apartment building and town homes. You can't think that is a simple block swap based in actual land mass.

I get that you are upset (though I don't know why).  If it is distance we are talking about tenth of a mile. If your kids are at Murch they will continue on.  If your kids aren't at Murch yet then you will be in for Hearst which not only will have pre-3, a new facility and is clearly on the right path. Sorry, I just don't get what the big issue is. [/quote]

Add to this the fact that OP keeps posting about the Murch/Hearst scenario without saying Murch/Hearst because OP knows the flames that would erupt over such a relatively small change based on the proposals.  My empathy levels are low with this one.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics