Reply to Question for Supporters of New WotP High School

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Question for Supporters of New WotP High School"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Changing the status of Ellington is under discussion simply because no one currently in-bounds for Wilson would consider narrowly re-drawing Wilson's boundaries closer to Wilson's neighborhood.  Wilson's overcrowding problems would be solved, for example, if its eastern boundary ended at Connecticut Avenue.  Then, everyone east of Connecticut avenue that had formerly been bound for Wilson, would go to Roosevelt.

The effect would be grand:  A lot of high-SES kids from Cleveland Park and Adams-Morgan areas would go to Roosevelt and immediately increase the overall academic achievement there.  Ellington would be left alone.  Voila.[/quote]

A huge geographic mass of DC is assigned to Wilson.    Why move students from Cleveland Park which is closer to Wilson than many residences closer to the Ellington site?

Co-locating Ellington as a magnet program at Roosevelt is an efficient idea. Turning the Ellington site into a regular high school makes sense.  Montco co-located the science/tech public exam magnet school program at Montgomery Blair.
Enrollment current/2002-03: 
Coolidge 433/843, 99% FRL, in boundary 46%
Roosevelt 438/821, 99% FRL, in boundary 65%
Wilson 1696/1476 (overcapacity 10+years ago), 30% FRL, in boundary 54%
Ellington 541/485, 40% FRL- metro NA
Banneker 430/NA, 61% FRL - walkable from metro for teens, Howard U
School without Walls 585/NA, 20% FRL - metro, GW

Boundary maps :  http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/Learn-About-Schools/Attn_Zones_High_2013_2014.pdf
2002-03 source:  http://www.21csf.org/csf-home/DocUploads/DataShop/DS_143.pdf[/quote]

Enrollment current/2002-03:

Banneker 430/[b]NA[/b], 61% FRL - walkable from metro for teens, Howard U
School without Walls 585/[b]NA[/b], 20% FRL - metro, GW

Boundary maps :  http://dcps.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/Learn-About-Schools/Attn_Zones_High_2013_2014.pdf
2002-03 source:  http://www.21csf.org/csf-home/DocUploads/DataShop/DS_143.pdf[/quote]

I think Banneker enrollment has stayed about the same as ten years ago.
SWW has grown from 430 ten years ago (over capacity for the building then) to 585 (over capacity for the building now).  SWW FRL numbers used to be 40%, now 17%.  (from memory, not from old docs.)

Banneker was originally proposed for Capitol Hill, on the Blue/Orange metro line at the now-abandoned Hine Junior High space with excellent access to all of the city.  It was located instead, as a conscious choice, in a location that was not anywhere near accessible to the enclaves of white families.  The concern was that if it was easy to get to it would "flip" and become a white, academic HS.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics