Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Should welfare recipients be required not to have children while on welfare? Agree or disagree? Why "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pointless to debate this crap. No one-size-fits-all solution to socioeconomic dilemmas such as this, welfare recipients having children. From a social standpoint one can easily ask the question, "Who the hell are you to tell me I can't have kids?" From an economic standpoint one can easily ask the question, "Who the hell are you to demand I shell out more tax dollars?" Somebody's [i]rights[/i] are going to get infringed upon. Somebody's [i]ethics[/i] are going to be compromised. Somebody's [i]ideals[/i] are going to get tossed aside. Ultimately you'll be left with the question, "Whose rights and ethics and ideals are more important, the wealthy few in control or the underprivileged poor who far outnumber them?" Good luck answering that question. [/quote] You're trying to turn it into a chicken-or-egg question and inject what I believe to be false equivalency - let's look at it more fundamentally than that. In ancient times, if you could not afford to feed or shelter your kids they would die of starvation and exposure. That fundamental responsibility to protect them is first and foremost on the parent. If the parents are blowing it and aren't fulfilling their responsibilities, then ethics and ideals are already out the window. How meaningful is a perceived right to have kids when you would just leave your children to die in absence of someone else taking care of them? The social safety net provided by taxpayer dollars is the "nice to have" but is not and has never been central in terms of responsibility and ethics - the role, responsibility and ethics of society as a whole to take care of your kids is definitely secondary to the role of the parents themselves.[/quote] Wow, you are cold. I take it you lucked out in being born to parents who took care of you.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics