Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "The decade-long "learning recession""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The common core curriculum is not great. We have been overseas frequently for work and the private schools with a British curriculum are almost always more rigorous than ones with an American curriculum that typically follows common core. [/quote] I disagree that the British system is more rigorous. They are different and the British system is not something most Americans would care for. I’ve read a lot of posts here that their children are no longer reading complete books. I don’t understand that at all. The one change I think is positive is using online programs for subjects like history or geography. You can no longer trust the accuracy of textbooks coming from Texas. McGraw Hill has been accused of whitewashing history, omitting important parts of history, calling slaves “workers” to name a few. They have been made to change errors in their books. Online, the Library of Congress, Lehrer Institute of History, History.com is a reputable site. High school should absolutely be using personal laptops. The internet has opened worlds of information that wasn’t available decades ago. Elementary school needs to learn the basics, no laptops necessary. [/quote] So you think whatever a teacher puts together in her free time to make money on Teachers Pay Teachers is better than a textbook? You know districts...don't have to buy textbooks that don't align with the politics of the majority, right? And also - class novels aren't textbooks, and usually that's what people are referring to when they talk about not reading full books. My kids are in private with textbooks and trust me they aren't reading the geometry or science book cover to cover. But they are reading The Hobbit or Romeo and Juliet cover to cover.[/quote] Why would you think the teachers Would be putting together anything? These excellent programs are put together professionally and bought by the school department. The middle school has some amazing programs done on line where the 7th graders learn about every country in the world plus each individual country’s political system, their GDP, climate, agriculture, religions and the people. A book could never be as interactive. As for textbooks they should never have political bias. I’m more concerned of inaccurate information. There’s plenty of evidence and forced retractions about changing facts in American history. Why not have middle school and high school students go directly to the source of American history which would be the American government and read the treaties, constitution, rules and regulations. Save a lot of paper. And our schools pass out novels that they read. I only am familiar with middle school but my daughter ha read The Outsiders, Holes, The Giver, and Refugee that I remember. I don’t think everyone is talking about textbooks when they say the elementary schools aren't having them read complete books. I know we never read textbooks from cover to cover. Either people who believe everything should be done on the laptop or eliminate all laptops in grades 6-12 are being extreme and irrational. [/quote] What's the name of that middle school program?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics