Reply to Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You are not facing 15% vs 35% choice. You are facing 15% (current recommendation) vs. 20% (proposal to modify). I guess 20% is still something too much to stomach for you.[/quote]

My comment was regarding choice of buying in Tilden area vs buying in North Bethesda MS area a few years ago.
I will be fine with 20% as well. [/quote]

Fair enough. I am sorry for accusing you. There are some WJ posters here who work 24/7 to run interference on the proposal to modify the recommendation just to trim down FARMS a couple of percentage points, so I am a little jumpy.[/quote]

PP here. Given it was all one school, I don't see why balancing of FARMS can't happen. Even after balancing, WJ will have far less FARMS than Woodward. in all scenarios, future WJ part is not going to have much higher FARMS than current WJ, but Woodward part will have much higher FARMS in all cases. So I don't see why make it worse by assigning 2 high FARMS ES to Woodward.

I think Woodward community needs to step up to advocate. Not sure what role PTA played here because I heard that they took no position.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics