Reply to Full pay question

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Full pay question"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Relevant quotations from the summary judgment opinion. The summary judgment briefing gets a bit more specific as to what evidence we're looking at, though some of it is redacted.

[quote]Accordingly, for the 568 Exemption to apply, every institution in the agreement must admit all students on a need-blind basis. Because it is undisputed that some of the 568 Group members did not do so, none of the universities may benefit from the 568 Exemption's protections in this case.[/quote]

[quote]The students have produced sufficient evidence for a jury reasonably to find that each of the universities claiming the exemption favored wealthier applicants and therefore did not admit all students "on a need-blind basis." The universities resist this conclusion by arguing that a school is still need-blind even if it engages in wealth favoritism.[/quote]

https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvbbezxrvq/Henry%20v%20Brown%20summary%20judgment%20order%2020261201.pdf

I can only access the briefing through LexisNexis. I don't know how to do a document share, but if someone wants to show me how to publicly share a document via link, I'd be happy to do it. Here are some quotes from the SJ briefing:

[quote]Northwestern and Notre Dame stipulated that for each year from 2003 through 2022, the school 'in some instances admitted students based on factors which included the applicant's family's donation history and/or capacity for future donations.'[/quote]

[quote]Vanderbilt stipulated that [for 2003 through 2022], in some instances it admitted students based on the 'financial circumstances' of the student or the student's family as the Court has interpreted that terms.[/quote]

[quote]Penn's applicants with special-interest tags were admitted at a much higher rate than waitlisted applicants without such tags.[/quote]

[quote]Defendants such as [redacted] admitted waitlist applicants with regard to whether those applicants had applied for financial aid."[/quote]

[quote]Defendants also considered the financial circumstances of low-income applicants.[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics