Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They will never make everyone happy but these options make the most sense. Also there is supposed to be a demographic cliff at some point, with fewer children being born resulting of course in fewer students in our schools.[/quote]

Except on facility utilization and demographics, two of the four factors and these options are terrible on these[/quote]

Might as well give up on trying to equalize demographics unless you want super long bus rides for poor kids.

Or change housing policy.[/quote]

And most poor kids and their families want to attend the local school. Just like the rich kids. Funny how that works. [/quote]

There is a difference between what individual families want and what is feasible/efficient. Everyone wants their kids to go to the closest school (except for ToK, they are special that way). But everyone CAN'T go to the closest school. It is physically impossible.[/quote]

Right. So then they’re probably looking at the next closest option. Where in this proposal do you see a massive disconnection between the closest option and the proposed one? Maybe that should be the focus of any constructive feedback. [/quote]

I see disconnect between the massive overcrowding at Wheaton they are proposing and the underutilization of multiple west county schools[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics