Reply to Kimmel

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Kimmel"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I hate Trump and do not like Kirks message at all but good riddance to Kimmel.  Less of all this smug UMC diet coke leftism please.[/quote]

Kirk’s message is that we are all sinners in need of a Savior. You don’t need to agree. You just need to love this country as much as liberals used to—and [b]make room for everyone to express whatever opinion they want and deal with their own social consequences. [/b]Freedom of speech means your government cannot jail you or punish you. Doesn’t mean you are guaranteed employment if your choose to express views that costs your employer sponsors or—in Kimmels case—expresses disdain for roughly half of the U.S. population when your show is supposed to attract viewers so that your sponsors make money.
Kimmel thought he was too big to worry about any of that.
He was wrong.
[/quote]
Is this why Kirk devoted so much energy to upping the consequences for college professors that he disagreed with? I'm sorry, but the idea that Kirk is a free speech martyr is offensive to the concept of freedom of expression.[/quote]

Granted I didn’t know who this Charlie Kirk person was a week ago, but I’ve now had a lot of exposure to him. He wasn’t going after professors just because they were liberal. He wasn’t going after professors who were unfairly biased against conservative students, and also professors who refused to engage with anyone who didn’t share their liberal beliefs.

Or at least that’s my understanding. If you have a clip or writing from him suggesting he wanted “consequences” against professors simply for being liberal (which would be pretty much all professors), please share![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics