Reply to Wedding Party Guest Goes Silent

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Wedding Party Guest Goes Silent"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] You’re still rationalizing. You didn’t get randomly assigned to a venue. You chose a venue with a capacity limit that means you have to make tough choices, and you’re choosing not to extend plus ones to the wedding party so you can invite other people. It’s rude as hell. The fact that other clods do it doesn’t mean it’s not rude. You’re right about one thing, though; this probably does go over better with twenty-somethings who have not yet been in serious, long term, adult relationships and aren’t used to being treated like adults yet.[/quote]

Work on reading comprehension. We are planning a wedding for one of our kids, never said it was mine. And I am defending OP but never said wedding party does not bring a guest, and in fact there is no wedding party but a large wedding. And to the other poster who suggested it is discriminating to distinguish between people who are married and those that aren’t in long-term relationships or have a steady SO - talk about a lack of logic. That’s just crazy.[/quote]

No, it's basic math, clownass. Married couples aren't the same person; they can be separate without dying. You are assigning greater value to some people's relationships than others, and it's wack as hell. That you've lumped fiances into the "can haz" group just shows how nonsensical your shit is, as if people don't break off engagements (like your future spouse prolly should; you're a mess). "steady SO" vs "tinderella" gave your game away in the first post. You suck as a person.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics