Reply to Should I buy a beach vacation home?

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "Should I buy a beach vacation home?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I laugh when people say "don't buy a house at sea level because of global warming!" even though I do believe global warming is real.

Know what else is at sea level?:

New Orleans, Louisiana
Miami, Florida
New York City, New York
Boston, Massachusetts
San Francisco, California
Charleston, South Carolina
Norfolk, Virginia
Long Beach, California
Galveston, Texas
Atlantic City, New Jersey
Wilmington, North Carolina
Tampa, Florida
Savannah, Georgia
Oakland, California
Honolulu, Hawaii
Amsterdam
New Orleans
Jakarta
Bangkok
Venice
Rotterdam
Tokyo
Lagos
Alexandria
Dhaka
Mumbai
Manila
Ho Chi Minh City
Singapore
Karachi
Copenhagen

Many more people than beach house owners are gonna have issues.  As in, everybody on earth.

So go ahead and enjoy that beach house while you can.  I sure enjoy the hell out of mine![/quote]

I don't really find the argument "Ho Chi Minh City is also going to have flood problems, so the fact that my beach house won't be insurable in the next 5-8 years is fine with me!" very persuasive.

[/quote]

That ignorance is your issue.  It does not change the facts.

[quote]
Investing, or even building, in an area that is only going to be more and more exposed to potentially destructive weather is crazy. Even if you're not looking at a beach house as an investment, it just doesn't seem like a good long-term play. It's not going to be a generational asset, and it's just going to be more and more of a pain in terms of maintenance.[/quote]

[b]And the point was there are hundreds of millions of people in coastal locations, and a good portion of the world's economy.  If your beach house is underwater permanently, the entire world will be farked.  Are you going to spend your time left here on this planet worried about that?  Well, you do you, I will not.
[/b]
[quote]It becomes everyone else's problem when beach house owners start expecting financial bailouts for their bad decision making. [/quote]

Ahh, there's the tell, Miss Rand!  Since you are someone who never, ever benefits from anything civic, and who lives in a place shielded permanently from flood, earthquake, tornado, fires, or any other kind of disaster, then your righteous indignation is completely justified, and I bow before it.[/quote]

You're back to the idea that "just because a lot of people are doing this dumb thing, it's totally cool for me to do it too".

If someone is genuinely asking if it's a good idea to invest in an expensive asset that is rapidly getting riskier and risker because of climate issues, the answer should be "no" regardless of whether other people have made the mistake or whether Ho Chi Minh City has a flooding problem. [/quote]

Stop with the pull out of ho hi minh city. It shows you are not an honest interlocutor.  Let's use good 'ol NYC instead, hokay?  Where wall street is, and the center of global banking?  Because that location is just as risk prone as the outer banks.[/quote]

A) PP provided a list including Ho Chi Minh City as if it mattered. If we're all in agreement that it doesn't, we can move on and dismiss that silly post.

B) An enormous amount of money is being spent to protect Manhatten and there's a lot of concern. What does that have to do with it being a good idea for YOU to buy a property that will shortly be uninsurable?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics