Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not the end of the world but it still is not great for the average level player with an August birthday that won't get to play with either his SY, the team they have been with for years or the majority of the kids their BY. Not everyone is worried about college I'd sessions. I understand there has to be a cutoff but 8/1 was probably the worst choice[/quote] Agreed 9/1 was the better choice. 🫡[/quote] 9/1+30/60 is even better. You get the 9/1 cutoff but if players can prove their grade and were born 30 or 60 days before 9/1 they can play with that group. This addresses players playing down and also gets rid of the edge case trapped players.[/quote]This wouldn't work. Not all kids have defined grades, schools don't really have uniform IDs for kids by grades in most districts and clubs can't police this. This exception idea seems like a poorly thought out coffee shop discussion from people wanting an edge for their kid that has no chance in the real world.[/quote] It exists and people are considering it. You might have one commenter that just wants to try and win arguments. Its the logical way to answer the trapped player question.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics