Reply to TJ 1.5% accepted?

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ 1.5% accepted?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Does TJ automatically accept the top 1.5% of each middle school? When you have many more than 1.5% taking the same classes and getting all A’s, what happens next?[/quote]
The top 1.5% doesn't refer to GPA or courses taken.  
All kids applying to TJ write a bunch of personal essays and a problem solving essay.  The essays are graded, and the kids' scores are based on the essay scores, unweighted GPA, and experience factors (FARMS, IEP, ESOL).  The unweighted GPA is not a huge factor, and they don't even look at courses taken or math level.

If a school has 600 8th graders, then it is guaranteed 1.5% of 600 = 9 TJ spots.  The 9 kids with the highest scores are offered admissions.  [/quote]

But the highest scores are not the smartest  or most prepared, due to the new system eliminating math level, objective testing, courses taken and teacher recommendations,  correct?[/quote]
That is correct.  They may be the smartest.  They may not be. The ranking is mostly based on the essays and experience factors.[/quote]

The idea was to get as close to a lottery as possible, which was the solution that the FCPS board tried to push the hardest.

Put a low threshold so that many would qualify and then try to keep the information available on the student to the minimum possible. Then, you get closer to the desired "should represent FCPS demographics". The main problem for FCPS board from achieving this is because of self selection bias and the pool of students who are applying do not represent FCPS demographics.

Just like most opportunists who took advantage of the riots in 2020 to pursue their own interests, FCPS board did the same. [/quote]

Not really.. The idea was to address the rampant cheating that had tainted selection since many were buying early access to the entrance exam.[/quote]

I am sorry your child did not get in. Please do not be bitter, as it would impact your child.

I understand your frustration and why you are agitated, but calm down for your kids sake.[/quote]

There were test banks at certain prep schools with questions kids memorized and told the schools. The test banks gave the students at those schools an advantage. We have seen issues with the AMC tests along these lines as well. MathCounts reminds parents to not take pictures of questions and post them because there are kids in other sections taking the tests later. There is plenty of evidence of cheating/unfair advantages in higher level math competitions and tests.

[/quote]
as fictional as your stories are, can you dare to name one prep school that did this? [/quote]

DP but wasn’t it Curie? They used to post the names of all their students who got accepted to TJ and it was close to if not over 100 students every year until the criteria changed. [/quote]

It was one year.  They did that one year and the parents were furious to see their kids names in the newspaper identified as having prepped since 3rd grade.[/quote]

Some students admitted to [bold]memorizing[/bold] and providing questions back to Curie to include in the test bank. That was the year that the Quant test was dropped. The suspicion is that other programs were doing something similar but had not had the same level of success. [/Quote] you have a cite for this?

[Quote]There is no way to know if the students who were named had prepped since 3rd grade, the listing only included them in the specific program to prepare for the TJ test that year. There is speculation that many of the kids participated in enrichment programs for a long time. I could care less about that. My kid does math enichment because he enjoys it. Does it help him in school? Yes. Will it help him with whatever test TJ admission uses? Yes. There is no way to remove that element.

Creating a test bank of used questions is a step above enrichment. The test company was not doing its job in adjusting the test on an annual basis, which allowed the test bank to be more useful. There were posts that kids had studied the exact questions that were on the exam, that is a failure of the company. That said, kids were given a huge edge if they were willing to pay a good amount of money to participate in a specific program to gain an advantage. [/Quote]

The"good amount of money" in question is $300.  That's what you pay for test prep above the enrichment.

[Quote]This isn't the SAT or ACT or LSAT or GRE where there are test books available and prep classes are commonplace. It isn't even the tests used by private schools that have tutors and prep programs. It was a test for a specific high school that is supposed to serve all of the kids in the area, not just kids who have access to schools with test banks. You cannot replace the Quant with something used at school because the vast majority of the kids applying to TJ should be passing advanced on their math SOL. Requiring an advanced pass on the math SOL would not remove most of the kids and the scores on the math SOLs for the Honors math classes in MS tend to average high. They really won't help with discriminating between students. [/Quote]

The SHSAT exists and pro books exist for it.  There were prep books for the TJ test and quant Q.  The prep part of this is the easiest part.  Use the PSAT of you want something ubiquitous.  That's what they use now for froshmore admissions.

[Quote]And even under that system there were parents complaining about who was accepted and chagrin that genius child from school X who participated in national competition y was not accepted. There is always going to be complaining about the admissions process. TJ is a public school that is meant to serve the population that is advanced and enjoys STEM. Your version of who should be accepted based on classes is simply different then what the administration thinks.
[/quote]

Any complaints can safely be ignored when the admission standards are objective and merit based.

The current method is subjective and has only a hint of merit.

[/quote]

DP.  The "prep books for the quant Q" are laughable and are basically a scam.  They are expensive and absolutely worthless, if you look at them instead of just tout their existence.  The prep from they-who-shall-not-be-named was invaluable, the proof was on their website.  [/quote]
TJ test prep at cutie was a $300 module over a few weeks.  [/quote]

Many parents spent far more than a few hundred dollars for TJ test prep.

[b]$2120[/b]
https://plcprep.com/1-on-1_tutoring.php

[b]$200-300 per hour[/b]
https://www.principiatutors.com/our-pricing

[b]$625 [/b]
https://fairfaxcollegiate.com/test-prep/tjhsst-prep

[b]$1000+[/b] including practice tests 
https://web.archive.org/web/20190411164031/http://katedalby.com/tj-admissions-prep/

$800 self paced
[b]$2400[/b] small group 
https://www.tjtestprep.com/

[b]$1950[/b]
https://www.principiatutors.com/tj-sps-pse-prep

[b]$6985[/b]+ signature program that runs over two years “pass any test for admission into specialized programs like AOS/AET and TJ”
https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/f3476daf-2f3a-478e-9e4a-0f297817f6fc/2024-2025%20Curie%20Academic%20Year%20Schedule%20(10.20..pdf 
[/quote]

The TJ test prep module at Curie was $300.  Curie is the test prep everyone seems to be offended by.  It's a classroom setting not one on one tutoring.[/quote]

No, we are talking about all of the great lengths that parents would go to in order to give their kids a leg up. Years of prep, moving to be in the "right" school zone, counselors to determine the best activities, etc. Wealthy parents have the knowledge and means to game the system and the admissions reflected that. 
[/quote]

Wealthy parents don't send their kids to TJ.  Wealthy parents in McLean send their kids to Potomac or Flint Hill for the less academically inclined kids.[/quote]

There is a lot of wealth in this area. Wealthy families have options - some focus on private, others focus on TJ. Either way, they have the knowledge and means to give their kids a leg up in admissions.

1. Kids from wealthier families have many advantages over kids from lower-income families across the board when it comes to education. Family knowledge and support, tutoring, prep classes, special extracurricular activities, grades, test scores, etc.
2. Wealthier parents can and do pay for things to improve their kids’ chances. 
3. Wealthier parents tend to understand the application process better - for both TJ and private school. 
4. Kids from wealthier families have a higher chance of admission to TJ and private school.  
5. Some middle schools have more kids from wealthier families than others. 
6. Before the admissions change, there were many middle schools that had no representation at TJ.  Those middle schools tended to have high FRE %s.

[/quote]

If wealth were the pathway to TJ then TJ would be majority white.  Clearly there is something other than wealth at play.  [/quote]

Certainly. Yes, wealthy white families know that TJ will be a grind and decrease their kids’ chances at top colleges.

That’s why a lower % of eligible white kids apply and why many don’t attend even after being accepted.

[/quote]

The class of 2015 was majority white.  They seemed interested in TJ before the Asian population around here.  White kids haven't been staying away, they have been getting crowded out by a large influx of asian kids

Everybody knows TJ will be difficult.  Everybody knows that going to TJ will probably not improve your college admissions results.  But the reason some kids go anyway is because the training at TJ is better.

In any event, with a 17% acceptance rate among white kids, the notion that white kids don't want to go to TJ is silly.  And considering the economic disparity between whites and asians, the notion that admissions is driven solely or even primarily by wealth is silly. [/quote]

The last time we did the math, almost 100% of eligible Asian students applied to TJ and only about 50% of white students.

White students also turned down TJ at a high rate than Asian students.

I’ve shared the data in the past and can it out again if you want to revisit.

It’s not solely about wealth, but kids from affluent families definitely had a huge advantage over kids who aren’t.

Kids from affluent MSs had a higher chance of getting into the pool. And accepted. [/quote]

I'm familiar with the data.

Yes, white students self select and Asians apply almost indiscriminately and yet Asians applying indiscriminately STILL have a higher acceptance rate.  White kids don't stay away because they don't want TJ they stay away because they know their limits

Wealth always helps, even now.  But the Stuyvesant' example shows us that it is not even close to being determinative.  It also shows us that testing doesn't exclude poor kids.

Kids from Rocky Run tested into the pool just as frequently as kids from Carson. The Carson kids got in more frequently than the Rocky Run kids based on the holistic elements.  [/quote]

Carson and Rocky Run have similar % FRE (16%, 19%) and similar % admitted pool 50%, 51%).

Now compare to Cooper (4% FRE) with 64% admitted to pool.

Or Jackson (53% FRE) with 36% admitted to pool.

For class of 2024.

When you look across the MSs (and don’t just cherry pick) you can see that middle schools with more affluent families had higher % acceptance to the pool. 
[/quote]
And?[/quote]

Money helps in various ways for the TJ admissions process (even now). One way was testing into the pool. 
[/quote]
Do you think advanced academic abilities, in general, is equally distributed across SES?[/quote]

No. A lot of “advanced academic abilities” are developed c/o $$$$. Family knowledge and support, tutoring, prep classes, special extracurricular activities, etc. 
[/quote]

This is 100% true, the same way that a lot of advanced athletic abilities are developed c/o $$$$.  Family knowledge and support, private lessons, prep sessions, special extracurricular sports teams/travel sports, etc.

The athletes who have parents invest time and money into them are the ones who end up playing varsity sports, in college, and eventually in professional sports leagues.  That is how sports work but…..none of that is possible without the players determination and dedication.  Some players also are born with extreme natural athletic abilities, especially children of professional athletes or other high level athletes.  They have inherited specific genes that allow them to be faster, more coordinated, etc.

I don’t understand why so many people on this forum make it seem like a “BAD” thing that some parents choose to spend money on increasing their children’s academic potential.  Is it a bad thing to do what you can to help your children’s academic potential?

It isn’t only wealthy families that put effort into their children’s education.  Parents can choose to raise their children so that they are focused on academics and reaching their potential.  Most students spend hours a day on screens.  TV, phones, gaming, watching YouTube.  Parents are ultimately allowing this to happen.  Instead of watching other people to their makeup or play video games, parents could choose to have their children watch educational videos.  Instead of playing games parents could require their students to play educational games online, or study the materials they are learning in school.  Everyone with an income has to decide how to spend their money.  Some parents choose to focus all of their efforts on their children, other parents choose to buy an expensive iPhone.[/quote]

Step aside a bit from your little bubble. 
Most parents understand your theory, but they don’t have the previledge to sit the whole day redirecting what your kid doing or drive your kid anywhere to meaningful activities.
There is bills and rent to pay, food to put in the table. Some family only can make bare minimum with both parents working their butt off, some don’t need to do anything for the next few generations because of their wealth.
Generalization is not a good term.
[/quote]
Get out of the woke mindset, and ask your self: Why is it that [b]these same families[/b] find time and financial resources to support athletics but not academics? Should their students be forced to pursue something they are not interested in? [/quote]

Which families are you referring to? 
[/quote]

Fictional families

Those wealthy family who support their athletics kids is not fighting the seat at TJ. [/quote]
Of course, they are not interested in TJ. Instead they are focused on getting a spot on the public school sports team.  [/quote]

So completely irrelevant to this discussion…
[/quote]

It does actually if you can comprehend the context better.
Certain poster here keep picturing “Poe MS - example” kid who get into TJ as: wealthy family who doesn’t have interest in Stem, get in by the handout, doesn’t care about academic tutoring but they are willing to spent alot of their money on basketball things.

They mixed up two different type of family, unrelated, for a narrative.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics