Reply to Trump Says Trials for Migrants "Not Possible"

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump Says Trials for Migrants "Not Possible" "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]POTUS is correct on this one. [/quote]

He does this to an “illegal alien” (but does have to show he’s illegal, because no due process)
So, he does it to someone here legally (who can’t prove they are here legally)
So, he does it to you and says you are here illegally (and you have not opportunity to prove you are a citizen)

We can take Trumps word for the fact everyone is here illegally and deportable. Despite the fact he and his appointees can’t keep reporters off chats that include war plans or keep track of a purse with $3000, a PIV card and a passport. But, let’s go out on a limb here and say he occasionally makes mistakes. Some of those mistakes are legal permanent residents. Some are US citizens. None of them get the chance to challenge anything before they are put on a plane and dumped in CECOT. And when the inevitable mistake happens, as it already has, he says “opppsss.  Still leaving them there”.

That’s why you need due process. To prevent US citizens from being dumped into El Salvadoran he11holes with no recourse.

Due process I’d your recourse.

Trump is not right. And if he can’t process the immigrants he wants to deport, he should stop firing immigration judges.  [/quote]

A short review of documents is all that is needed. Not a trial and endless appeals. [/quote]

They aren't even decent enough for that!![/quote]

The problem where do we detain everyone until we can do the "short review of documents." They are still coming in at an untenable rate - even if Trump hadn't fired any judges, how do we process (and mostly deport) all of these people without setting them loose into the country and asking them to pinky swear they will appear?[/quote]

By putting a monitor on them, detaining them or hiring more judges. Again, the Constitution— not option when it inconveniences you.

Also— border crossings? Right now down to 100-300 people a day. (And fewer if you consider family units). If we stop firing immigration judges, that’s very manageable. Do you have any idea how many claim SSA ALJs process (with 10-20 page opinions)?[/quote]

We have to fire the immigration judges, because they were hired by Biden with the same agenda.  Have to get new judges in like Jeff Sessions did.[/quote]

ALJs are specialized. AND JUDGES ARE NONPARTISAN. I know ALJs. They take that part very, very seriously. I work with them and couldn’t tell you their political leanings.  FFS, if you fire them all every 4 years, they never get up to speed, let alone get the competence to manage a caseload and mentor new Judges. And you don’t get to complain about a backlog. Because you created it.[/quote]

Wow - your ignorance here is breathtaking.

Immigration Judges are not ALJs; they are merely DOJ employees and they are NOT subject to the APA, while actual ALJs are subject to the APA:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_law_judge

Despite your profound ignorance of the topic being discussed, you nevertheless felt emboldened to spout your uninformed nonsense in at least two posts.

[/quote]That link lists Executive Office of Immigration Review.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics