Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "I go to a top LAC for history and stem. It is overrated."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]From what I can see, it does seem there's an issue for lac grads to get into good grad programs. From Pomona, where 2 recent Apker award winners have come from: [quote] Independent of the job market, if you want to consider graduate school you have to ask yourself three questions: -Do I have the grades to get into a reasonable graduate school? -What subfield of physics am I interested in, and what does this tell me about grad schools I should look at? -Do I have the motivation to go to and stay in graduate school? We can help you with the first two questions, but the third you have to answer for yourself. Coming from a small college with no Nobel laureates to write you letters of recommendation means that to get into the very top programs you will need both very good grades and a very good score on the GRE subject test. The “very top” programs are places like UC Berkeley, Stanford, CalTech, and Princeton. If your physics GPA isn’t a steady string of A’s and A-‘s, though, that doesn’t mean that you should start thinking about taking the LSAT. Many good graduate programs exist at schools other than the top ten; the “very top” programs have that ranking partly because they have excellent programs in essentially all subfields of physics. Especially if you have a pretty good idea of the subfield you might want to enter, you should look around at less well-known schools for strong programs in your particular area.[/quote] If a top LAC is explaining that they're at a disadvantage, no reason to not believe them. It is an issue that your professors aren't well known researchers/advancing the field of physics. Source: [url]https://www.pomona.edu/academics/departments/physics-and-astronomy/physics-academics/plan-senior-year[/url][/quote] A quick read of the entire page shows that it absolutely doesn't say what you are implying. Might want to quit trolling. The two Apkers say all that needs to be said.[/quote] They quote the plain text[/quote] [b]A quick read of the entire page shows that it absolutely doesn't say what you are implying. [/b] Read the commnet my little rocket scientist....the poster made a selective clip and I suggested reading the entire page as it doesn't actually say what the posrter is implying. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics