Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "FFRDCs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP and I'm not a lawyer, but what about philanthropic donors with business interests on the study topic who then gave money to MITRE or RAND knowing they had a special relationship with a gov agency? Seems suspicious[/quote] MITRE would never engage in a scenario like you’re suggesting. The alternative lines of business MITRE was pursuing, but has since stopped, were focused on topics that bridged government and industry interests. For example, securing the financial system takes solutions that require engagement from the banking industry and government. MITRE was trying to build new business around forming consortiums that would create technical solutions to tackle these problems, working with teams of big banks in this example. One of the requirements of those contracts was that the solutions developed needed to be shared openly for the greater good. It’s not a bad idea, but lots of staff didn’t like that it was a leadership focus that pulled MITRE away from its core FFRDC missions and sponsors.[/quote] https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/13/open-philanthropy-funding-ai-policy-00121362[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics