Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Middlebury ranking"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Top tier: SWAP+Bowdoin + Wellesley Next tier includes Middlebury, Varsar, Hamilton, Carleton, CMC[/quote] So wrong. Claremont McKenna is first tier, and significantly better than Swarthmore and Bowdoin in outcomes, and Middlebury is not far behind either. Vassar is around third tier.[/quote] Rankings aren't just about finance career outcomes; it’s overall excellence, which is something CMC struggles with. [/quote] Nonsense, CMC is an outstanding school. This type of crap is just annoying. Middlebury parent.[/quote] If you really want to get down into the details of the “next 10 tier,” after the top 5 of WASP and Bowdoin, there is no question that Harvey Mudd and CMC — and several other schools— are ahead of Middlebury. As a parent, you should be more concerned about Middlebury staying in that “next 10” than proclaiming about CMC’s status there, which — unlike Midd — is very secure. With Middlebury’s perpetual “over enrollment,” the permanent decline in study abroad, and Midd’s now taking 70% of its class ED, it is quickly headed in the direction of Bates and Colby. Not good.[/quote] [b]The HMC troll once again proves themselves to be a clueless idiot.[/b] Your incessant shilling for HMC and denigrating CMC is tiring. I'm not worried about Midds position in the rankings. Nor am I impressed by HMC. My kids was recruited by CMS and turned them down. As part of the process they were asked which school they preferred; Mudd didn't make the list even though the kid was offered by MIT as well. Kids go where they feel fit and your nonsensical ramblings aren't going to change anything.[/quote] You are responding to a poster putting both Harvey Mudd and Claremont McKenna in the second tier of 10 liberal arts schools, following the significant drop off from the top 5 (WASP+Bowdoin). Learn how to read.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics