Reply to VDA pt

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "VDA pt"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How is the rebuild going?  Heard alot of offers out but not to current players?[/quote]

My question is what does that say about the development at the club if that many players have been cut over a 2yr span from 1 team?  Maybe ECNL should really go back to not having teams at the U13 age group for starters.[/quote]

It says that VDA develops their own, but won’t hesitate to replace you if a better player comes along. I respect that even though it might seem
unfair to certain parents on DCUM.[/quote]

That's one way to look at it.  I think we're talking about upwards of 8-10 players though in that period.  That's abnormally high turnover.  As a parent that might be coming in at U13 you have to question whether or not they'd get better development elsewhere.  No knock on them given the reputation at the HS age groups, you just can't ignore that.  Someone surely has enough time on their hands to go see how many original players remain on each team from the pwsi vsa pipeline.
[/quote]

Pretty easy to see the homegrown talent on the high school age teams. Rosters are online. Vda is doing what any other club would do, they take the top players that attend their ID sessions. I expect my DD‘s coach to take the best players available for her team and not have silly loyalty because a certain player started at the club when they were a u little. Players don’t have any loyalty to the clubs and the clubs don’t have any loyalty to the players.[/quote]

You're missing the point.  It's not about loyalty, it's about player development.  Simple if then statement.  If player development was actually happening at that club in the first two years then you wouldn't have such high turnover.  There has to be something wrong with the initial election process at the least.  That's just my opinion.[/quote]

So player development for you is making the 18 players selected at u13 the best 18 players in NOVA so they can’t be replaced? That doesn’t seem possible.[/quote]

You hand pick 18 kids.  Only 8 of the kids are capable of continuing to play beyond the first two years?  Multiple factors that go into it, but isn't over 50% a bit high to you?  By all means take the best, but why aren't you producing better in house.  We have people in this forum from every club in the area, so how about everyone chime in and compare training environments.  Simply playing adjacent to top talent isn't development though it can aid development.  Winning isn't development.  You should be able to look at a team, judge them on everything outside of physical attributes and come away with some sort of assessment.  Gripes about that 2011 team include the idea that a bunch of athletes were selected that they hoped they could turn into soccer players.  Now about two years and x amount of dollars later they're cast away but were never given the tools to succeed.[/quote]

Currently 16 on the roster. 11 of those 16 are returning. 5 are not returning.[/quote]
Must be a lot of new FVU and NVA players. Interesting. [/quote]yap…. And they now how to show and prove amongst the battle tested titans already on these teams.  Can they live up to the instagram hype and marketing from previous clubs that thought those girls would never leave…. Will the old guard welcome the evacuees with open arms or bloody vicious slide tackles.

Find out next season on ECNL…..[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics