Reply to How many men would stay w/o sex

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "How many men would stay w/o sex "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Although this happens, it's not as common as a healthy wife with no physical problems preventing her from having sex, she just doesn't want to and refuses.  The better question is, how many men in THAT situation would stay?[/quote]

"She just doesn't want to and refuses" so you want to have sex with someone against their will? Should they just lie back and take it? What on earth is wrong with you?[/quote]

Where did he say that? Wow, gaslight much? When you marry someone and unilaterally decide to take sex off the table is the pinnacle of selfish. [/quote]

It's almost like sex involves TWO interested and enthusiastic parties, and that people's libidos can change with age, relationship status/closeness, life events, etc. Get over it. [/quote]

sute. but if you love someone and are not a selfish jerk like you, you try to meet their needs. its not surprising to see you come back with anotner "me, me, me" comment to justify your selfishness. [/quote]

Sex is not actually a need, that's ridiculous. Sure, it makes life more fun when you have an active and engaged sex life. Then again, why is it expected that the male sex drive takes primacy? After all, many women consider themselves to have an active, fulfilling sex life when they have sex, say, once a week or maybe even once a month. For many women that's more than enough, and they're excited and fulfilled by such frequency. Why is it that the male libido is supposed to set the tone and pace, to the point where men will whine about a "sexless marriage" when that's clearly not the case and theyre still having regular sex with their wife, only it's maybe just ever two weeks instead of every day the way they'd prefer? Many women prefer quality over quantity, i.e. a really amazing sexual encounter where THEY GET TO ORGASM (not just the husband) over daily rushed sex and quickies, that men seem to like more. So if the woman is happy with the frequency, why are we supposed to treat it like some kind of crisis? Meanwhile, when women bend to men's desires, and force themselves to have sex every few days regardless of whether they want it or not, it's just taken as de rigeur, "healthy compromise". There's such a double standard. [/quote]

One, sex is litteraly a biological need. This is how we have continued to exist for millions of years. Two, you’re moving the goalposts. If you’re having sex with your husband, then you didn’t decide to stop having sex as the poster you replied to originally suggested. Three, in a loving, caring relationship no one’s needs are more important. If you know your husband likes it every day, but you like it twice a month, maybe you talk about it and find a compromise. You don’t do it as often as he likes maybe but you also just find a way to connect even if it’s not the perfect mood/situation you need. Marriage is mostly about compromise and sex is no different. [/quote]

If sex was legitimately a "need", half the men on this forum, according to them, wouldnt be around anymore. And yet most of them stay, and just whine and moan about it and make up victim nonsense towards their wife. [/quote]

Wow, some of you treat your spouses really horribly and then laugh at them when they protest. “Victim nonsense?”You’re just terrible. 
[/quote]

This.[/quote]

But it’s literally not a need and yes if you say it’s a need you are moaning about victim nonsense.

If it’s a want, that is a dealbreaker for you then make that clear upfront when you get married. If you are in a catastrophic accident and you can’t have sex with me, I will leave you.

Let the woman decide if she wants to marry you.

But there are plenty of men who would not leave in this scenario[/quote]

Sort of like you made clear upfront that sex is only for a few years and then you and only you can decide you don't want to anymore and your husband is a "victim., and childish, and immature" for having a basic human need you knew about before you married him. [/quote]

Unless I have a crystal ball that told me I was gonna be in a catastrophic accident they made it impossible for me to have sex would be very difficult for me to tell my husband that upon marriage or during dating.

If I was in a catastrophic accident, and my husband left me because he couldn’t have sex I would forever never have respect for him.

Sex is not a basic human need it’s a want.[/quote]

Were you in fact in a catastrophic accident?[/quote]

Hey **** read the beginning of this thread. This whole thread is about a woman who is in a catastrophic accident and could not have sex.

The question is if your wife was in a catastrophic accident and could not have sex, would you leave her?

That is the whole point of this **** thread you moron.[/quote]

Hey, idiot. If you can't follow along please don't respond. You started belittling a man who said many women simply decide to not have sex for no apparent health reason. I know comprehension and nuance are not your strong suit, but you could at least try. [/quote]

Go join the 3M other thread of men bemoaning the lack of sex from their otherwise healthy wife. This one is not about that.[/quote]

The one I was responding to most definitely was. [/quote]

Not every thread is about you.

Go create your own thread about your victim syndrome over lack of sex and how you may die if the need is not met.[/quote]

No, I'll keep doing what I am doing. YOU can feel free to stop responding to me though. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics