Reply to How can we combat deep misogyny?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "How can we combat deep misogyny?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.   [/quote]

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate? 
[/quote]

In this case, it was. Tells you something about the female candidate, right?[/quote]

No, it doesn't. It just says that you'd rather vote for a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon than a woman (and God forbid a black woman). But let me guess, you're an old white dude. [/quote]

I’m not this poster but am a woman who voted for Hillary and did not vote for Kamala.  But, sure, blame it on misogyny instead of looking at the candidate and the policy positions she’s taken over the years. [/quote]

I really want just one of you to tell me in a way that makes sense how Kamala was less qualified than Trump, or Nikki. [/quote]

Kamala has the intellect and communication skills of a fence post.
You are welcome even if you cannot comprehend.[/quote]

Hmmmm not sure if you watched the same debate with Trump that I did, but she owned his ass.

So no, I cannot comprehend because it's just another "I hate Kalmala but I can't explain why."

You hate her because she is a black woman. just own it.[/quote]

NP.  She was rehearsed, rehearsed, rehearsed for the debate. That's not good communication skills; that's just acting. People who are really smart and good communicators can carry conversation without teleprompters and endless practice. Like JD Vance.[/quote]

JD isn’t president, Trump is. Why didn’t you cite him as good ar debating or communicating. The amount of gaslighting…[/quote]

I'm perfectly willing to state that JD had a much better debate against Walz than Trump did against Kamala. I disagree with you that she "owned him." She had a few well-practiced lines that landed well, but she came across as stilted and over-rehearsed overall. She practiced and practice her opening line - I was born in a middle class family - and was going to use that as a first response, no matter what the question.

That is not a sign of a quick-thinking, intelligent person.[/quote]

Oh FFS, the quick thinking moron you revere was baited time and time again. Why wasn't he able to think quickly on his feet and not take the bait? Being well prepared served her well. She knew exactly what to say and when to say it in order to get him to lose his mind. Are you under the impression that Trump had any fresh material during that debate? That he spoke from the heart?

Like i said, it didn't matter because no one was changing their minds at that point. But please stop the BS of how she was overly prepared.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics