Reply to NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am going to go ahead and guess that the bodily rights of the unborn babies (i.e., the right to actually keep their body) are not going to be given much consideration in this thread.[/quote]

Do you think the bodily rights of embryos and fetuses take prominence over other considerations in any cases, such as forcing the raped 10 year old in Ohio to carry to term?

If not, why not?[/quote]

Why didn’t the raped 10 year old child’s mother report the rape to police? Didn’t the mother’s boyfriend rape the girl at age 9 and impregnate her, and the child’s mother allow her daughter to be raped because she was covering for her pedophile boyfriend? [/quote]

Stop changing the subject. Do you or do you not believe a raped 10 year old should be forced to go to term with the pregnancy that resulted the rape?[/quote]

A 10 year old child of an illegal immigrant mother is repeatedly raped at age 9 by the illegal immigrant mom’s illegal immigrant pedophile boyfriend and your opinion is the innocent baby wasn’t killed quickly enough? [/quote]

The “innocent” in this scenario is the 10 year old. That is what you fundamentally misunderstand. There is no baby in this scenario, because the child was allowed to abort a fetus.
I hope that clears things up for you. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics