Reply to Looking to 2028

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Looking to 2028"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Way, way, way too much emphasis put on the trans issue...something that affects so relatively few of us.[/quote]

It affects all of us that are women or have daughters. I don’t want the term women to be politically incorrect . That’s taking identity politics too far. I hear the term pregnant person or menstruating person is now the PC terminology for women in some circles . Wtf?  JK Rowling getting death threats for truth telling is insane. If the Republicans  are anti choice and anti woman, so are the Democrats really if they let men define what woman is and invade women’s spaces [/quote]

Go ahead and call yourself a pregnant woman if you want. No transgender person cares. Women is not a politically incorrect term and you know it. You just want to call transgender men women. It's literally transphobic bigotry. And yes, you can call me out for calling you a transphobe if you want but you literally but think you're getting some kind of internet points by not admitting it. People on DCUM aren't as stupid as you think they are. Your posts are nothing but dog whistles and anti-trans speech. Then you bring up Joanne Rowling for absolutely no reason other than to flex your gender critical muscles.[/quote]
NP. Your whole shtick is very 2022. No one gives a sh-t anymore about being called “transphobic” for recognizing the reality that what transgender people want is insane. You all took it too far and have zero political power left.

Anyway, over here in reality, normal people have real problems. You can only get away with that ultra fringe identity BS when things are going well. No one has that kind of patience right now. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics