Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "50/50 split of assets with SAHM "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lots of crazy lazy women posting. Of course a SAHM did not contribute to the success of OP and should not get 1/2, that’s insane. [/quote] It is true that raising kids does not entitle someone to 5 million dollars but you don’t think SAHMs who take care of their husbands’ children contribute to their success? At all? Do you think that if an especially lazy SAHM did nothing and the working spouse still had to do all the diapers, cooking, housekeeping, getting kids off to school, etc, in addition to working, his career wouldn’t be impacted at all? Not that it matters because a marriage is a contract like any other and has financial implications, but its so weird to me that someone can say with their whole chest that a the work of a SAHM contributes nothing to the career of h[/quote] Yes I think his career would not be impacted. SAHMs act like their agreement is a sacrifice when it was a gift. Bfd, the SAHM coordinated the cleaners and tutors.[/quote] I suspect that by the time my oldest is 17, DH and I will have a joint net worth of 10M. When we were looking at our options when thinking about kids, we looked at two options: we both get low-key, lower-paying jobs, or I become a SAHM. Had we not gone the SAHM route our assets would be significantly lower. This is a pretty common turn of events. It doesn’t mean that men whose wives SAHM are incapable of earning what they do if they had to take care of all the things a SAHM takes care of (although for some that definitely is true). It does mean that in cases like ours, the couple’s net worth is as high as it is only because one party stayed at home, since that is the choice they made. also it sounds like you are getting your information about SAHMs married to successful men from TV. Or maybe you just know a lot of losers. DH is a big law partner and the spouses of his colleagues who SAH are all extremely hardworking. [/quote] Cool story bro. No I know lots of very successful people and the fact you think every SAHM has the same value is insane. Also you were given a gift of not working. It’s not a sacrifice. Working hard is a sacrifice. I’m sad your H missed precious hours with his children so you could have your way. I think those lost hours are worth money and you should pay him for time lost, health impact of long hours and you generally using him for money. See there are many sides to a coin.[/quote] Are you having fun over there spinning yourself into knots to avoid the prospect that you might be wrong? [/quote] The reality is as more loser husbands start getting denied 50-50, so the same will happen with women who don’t contribute equally.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics