Reply to Aliens and the government

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Aliens and the government "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]newsnation is nonstop ufo[/quote]
No one else is. Obviously you believe this is all nonsense and given the lack of immediate evidence, that’s a rational choice to make.

But pretend for a second, if you will, that it is true that aliens are real, have been here, are here and we have their craft and some bodies (or body parts). If it were real, wouldn’t it be bizarre that no regular news media is touching this? That would be the story of the millennium to find out that aliens are real and have been here and there’s zero curiosity around it from regular media. [/quote]

Because there is literally no direct evidence of this existing. No direct evidence, only things Grusche said he saw and heard from others. Yes, there's some grainy photos but with all the cell phones and satellites and other sensors that exist, why hasn't anyone produced better evidence in decades?[/quote]
You don’t understand what’s happening at all here, do you.[/quote]

You seem like a nut job conspiracy theorist [/quote]
In what way? The PP who I said has no idea what’s going on said there “literally no direct evidence.” Well, duh. That’s what Grusch, Fravor and Graves want revealed. They’ve seen enough to be convinced and they think the American public is entitled to it as well. I’m really not sure how I am a nut job conspiracy theorist.

Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet says those three are legit and wants further info as well. https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4131211-ufos-are-the-story-of-the-century-wake-up-america/[/quote]

You keep referencing evidence that other people claim to have seen first hand. That’s not direct evidence, even if the person was a general officer or intel analyst or pilot or whatnot[/quote]
Dude, I can’t help you with your misunderstanding of this. [/quote]

New poster and I think you might misunderstand. I think the PP is talking about direct evidence, not hearsay from what some dude saidhe heard from someone else. -AF Reserve pilot.[/quote]
Right. Grusch is saying the actual evidence exists and is being kept from the American people. The hearings are to get the actual evidence out (or rather to work toward that since it’s not like this is going to move at top speed). No one on this thread has claimed that Grusch presented actual evidence at the hearing. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics