Reply to Secret Service Concludes Investigation...

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Secret Service Concludes Investigation..."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Would Hunter even go to the White House? Or even need to pass through that checkpoint?

Just seems it would be easier for them to meet up in Rehoboth.[/quote]

I was wondering this too.  This was a checkpoint for staffs d visitors.  I doubt the president and his immediate family are required to go through security checkpoints.  Does the SS frisk Jill every night before bed?  Seems unlikely.[/quote]

Except that the first reported location where the bag was found was not at the checkpoint.

Also, why won't they just make a statement that even though there are no fingerprints the bag does not belong to the first family? That would resolve all the issues. [/quote]

Sure, the RWNJs would just take the WHs word for it.  Ha!

What does the initial incorrect reporting have to do with anything?  It was actually found in a cubby at a security checkpoint.[/quote]

Why would not WH or their spokesperson issue such a statement? It is not about who accept it or reject it, it is about them not denying their involvement with drugs. [/quote]

Because the RWNJs would just take the denial as further evidence that it’s true.[/quote]

Why do you think that only right wing is interested in this information? I voted for Biden and I would like to know the answer.[/quote]

I'm also a Biden voter.  I strongly doubt it was Hunter's because he and other Biden family members are very likely not even screened and made to put their phones and other items into a cubby in the first place.  But I do think the Secret Service has a lot of unaccountable and untrustworthy cowboy behavior that needs to be reined in.  Whoever was responsible for destroying J6 evidence and wiping phones should have been sacked, along with any Secret Service officers who haven't been forthcoming about the exact timeline and facts of what happened that day.  Whoever was responsible for keeping tabs on the security screening area should also be sacked.  [/quote]
Democrats obviously cover for their own, so no one gets sacked. Funny how that works, right?[/quote]

"Their own?"  Sorry but it was not "their own" who destroyed evidence and wiped phones right after J6.  And those unaccountable scum who covered for Trump are still on duty at the Secret Service.

The only thing here working funny is your brain.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics