Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "married by 30"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Where do you live? And in which century?[/quote] If PP were from a previous century he’d know having kids in your 40s is incredibly common. How do you think all those women had 12 kids? [/quote] I wish people would stop throwing this out as if that wasn’t grandma’s 3rd-12th child not her first in her forties. There is a huge difference between already proven fertility in years post 35 within strict monogamy from never-been-pregnant-before post 35 and years of multiple sexual partners. It’s not only incredibly cavalier to advise young women to wait so late on purpose, it’s also callous to those of us in the devastation of infertility. I wouldn’t wish this on anyone.[/quote] “Within strict monogamy” lmao what are you talking about there have always been bastard children [/quote] Most people’s grandparents don’t have bastard children. My grandfather wasn’t the wealthy King of France, he was a postman and a devout Christian. So FOH. Even taking your premise as fact (it’s not), strict monogamy would have been expected on the part of the married woman in almost every instance.[/quote] Men spread their seed far & wide, sis.[/quote] You are so ideologically dug in that you’re missing the point, sis. Having your 4th child in your 40s is not the same as trying to have your 1st in your 40s, point blank period, and you’re lying if you say it’s just NBD like grandma did.[/quote] The reason why women had kids into their 40s back then is because they didn’t have reliable birth control. It has nothing to do with how many sexual partners they had or when they started TTC. How is this news to you? [/quote] OMG. Let me slow this down for you….. A woman attempting to have her first child, with no prior proven fertility, after 35 will not just “accidentally” get pregnant like the woman who had multiple children throughout the course of her childbearing years. For every 1 story you hear about “we got pregnant for the first time after pulling the birth control at 37!” there are way more women quietly dealing with the ordeal of primary infertility. An increased number of partners over a long span of time and non-barrier methods of contraception can contribute to tubal, cervical, or uterine factor infertility, and extended exposure to hormonal or metabolic disruptors can increase ovulatory or HPA factor infertility. Plus the physiological changes that occur in prior pregnancies prime the body for subsequent pregnancies, and by your mid 30s a nulliparous woman is behind that curve. There are no guarantees but the odds are very clearly tilted further in your favor in your twenties and in safe monogamous sex practices. Please stop obfuscating this point.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics