Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Florida school deems Michelangelo's David statute pornographic"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I don't understand why "parental rights" means one parent's preferences have to dictate what a whole school can see or read. If one parent really objects to a kid reading Toni Morrison or seeing David, can't that kid be prevented from looking at the statue or taking that book from the library? Why does every kid have to be denied these works, just because one parent's lost their mind? What if the other parents prefer that their kids DO see David or read Toni Morrison? Why do their preferences not count - why does a parent get to veto a whole class's or whole school's learning, instead of just their kid? I don't understand this at all.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics