Reply to Prince Harry’s book

Forum Index » The DCUM Book Club

Reply to "Prince Harry’s book"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why did he have to tarnish his brothers wedding making it about him putting Elizabeth Arden on his thingy and thinking of his mum doing it.  So much to unpack there.  Can't a bride and groom have their day.  Reminds me of their pregnancy announcement clouding Princess Eugenie's wedding.  [/quote]

and, this made me wonder why a single autobiography about a royal figure needed this kind of filler.  aren't there so many other bits to tell[/quote]

Of course there are. Harry deliberately focused on his own experiences and his own development and growth — not the history of the British Royal Family, and not events that primarily involved other people, even as they impacted him.  The 400 pages that he chose not to include in the book, as well as the stuff that he discussed with Moehringer for context and background are probably quite powerful.

I don’t think the book has a lot of filler — at least based on my quick reading of it. There was too much military stuff for my taste, just as I’m sure that the descriptions of palace decor that I enjoyed might have not been what other readers enjoyed.  I think there are aspects of the book that will appeal to many readers, especially those who are psychology-minded. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics